Using data from 115 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, researchers at UCLA analyzed the results of 7778 adult patients undergoing appendectomy for simple appendicitis in 2016.
Showing posts with label Normal appendix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Normal appendix. Show all posts
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Appendectomy outcomes in the modern era
Finally we have some data on the current rate of complications of appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. But that’s not all. This new paper, published online in the journal Surgery, reveals much about the diagnosis, technique, and outcomes of appendectomy in the United States.
Using data from 115 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, researchers at UCLA analyzed the results of 7778 adult patients undergoing appendectomy for simple appendicitis in 2016.
Using data from 115 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, researchers at UCLA analyzed the results of 7778 adult patients undergoing appendectomy for simple appendicitis in 2016.
Labels:
appendectomy,
Appendicitis,
CT scans,
Diagnosis,
Diagnostic Test,
laparoscopic appendectomy,
Normal appendix
Monday, November 13, 2017
Useless general surgical interventions that should no longer be done
England’s National Health Service (NHS) could save €153 million [$178 million USD] per year by scrapping 71 low-value general surgery practices says a recently published paper in the British Journal of Surgery.
The authors, from Imperial College London, extensively reviewed the literature and Choosing Wisely recommendations from a number of countries.
I agree with many of the 71 including performing a cholecystectomy during the first admission for a patient with symptomatic gallstones instead of waiting for another admission (saving more than €54 million) and not repairing minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias, which they estimate would save over €32 million.
The Telegraph reported, “The team also discovered that robotic surgery has ‘little or no advantage’ when compared with traditional keyhole operations and said it must be ‘considered a candidate for disinvestment.’” This probably wouldn’t fly here in the US, because—like guns—too many robots are already in the hands of users.
The authors, from Imperial College London, extensively reviewed the literature and Choosing Wisely recommendations from a number of countries.
I agree with many of the 71 including performing a cholecystectomy during the first admission for a patient with symptomatic gallstones instead of waiting for another admission (saving more than €54 million) and not repairing minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias, which they estimate would save over €32 million.
The Telegraph reported, “The team also discovered that robotic surgery has ‘little or no advantage’ when compared with traditional keyhole operations and said it must be ‘considered a candidate for disinvestment.’” This probably wouldn’t fly here in the US, because—like guns—too many robots are already in the hands of users.
Labels:
Appendicitis,
CT scans,
facemasks,
general surgery,
Normal appendix,
Research,
Surgery
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
What to do when a normal looking appendix is found at surgery for appendicitis
For patients undergoing surgery with a presumptive diagnosis of appendicitis in Norway and other parts of Europe, the protocol is if the appendix looks grossly normal in the operating room, it is usually not removed.
This approach was mentioned as part of a paper on the readmission of post-appendectomy patients from Oslo University Hospital. Most of the patients underwent laparoscopy based on clinical diagnosis with only 160 having CT scans and 67 having ultrasounds.
Of the 710 patients in the Oslo series, 94% of the appendectomies were done laparoscopically, and 111 had a normal appearing appendix at laparoscopy. The appendix was not removed in 88. The other 23 patients had appendectomies for various reasons, and those appendices were normal at pathology.
The cumulative rate of operating for what turned out to be a normal appendix (88 + 23 cases) was 15.6%, which the authors attributed to “the low use of preoperative CT” due to concerns about radiation exposure. That over 100 patients had unnecessary general anesthesia and surgery was apparently not a concern.
This approach was mentioned as part of a paper on the readmission of post-appendectomy patients from Oslo University Hospital. Most of the patients underwent laparoscopy based on clinical diagnosis with only 160 having CT scans and 67 having ultrasounds.
Of the 710 patients in the Oslo series, 94% of the appendectomies were done laparoscopically, and 111 had a normal appearing appendix at laparoscopy. The appendix was not removed in 88. The other 23 patients had appendectomies for various reasons, and those appendices were normal at pathology.
The cumulative rate of operating for what turned out to be a normal appendix (88 + 23 cases) was 15.6%, which the authors attributed to “the low use of preoperative CT” due to concerns about radiation exposure. That over 100 patients had unnecessary general anesthesia and surgery was apparently not a concern.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)