Since my review of the first episode of the new medical drama “Monday Mornings” generated quite a few comments, some of which thought the show had promise, I thought I’d give it another chance.
Although I have started to like a couple of the characters,
particularly Dr. Sung and the sassy Dr. Napur, the medical portions of the show
continue to disappoint. Dr. Sung said his evolving catch-phrase “Not do—dead”
at least four times and hit a milestone as he uttered a complete sentence
during the show.
Dr. Villanueva, the trauma surgeon, managed to diagnose
trichinosis after a brief (and I do mean brief) laying on of hands and two
questions. Trichinosis is a roundworm disease caused by eating raw or undercooked
pork. The CDC says there are fewer than 20 cases of trichinosis reported
in the US yearly and most of those come from eating game such as wild boar. The
domestic pork supply is virtually free of the problem. I am familiar with the
trauma surgeon community. I doubt that many of them could have picked out that
zebra.
Dr. Tina Ridgeway, the female neurosurgeon who is destined
to hook up with the hunky neurosurgeon with nightmares (another Dr. Jekyll? See
“Do
No Harm”), presented a case at M&M conference. The patient, a chef,
suffered olfactory nerve damage during a craniotomy for a meningioma. She acknowledged
that she relied on the resident to obtain informed consent. This is not
permitted in most hospitals. The chief of surgery then castigates her for
allowing the resident to do the case. When I was a chief of surgery, I usually
was faced with the opposite problem. Some of the attending staff were not
letting the residents do enough.
By the way, Dr. Hooten calls himself “Chief of Staff” and he
never takes care of any patients. While it is true to life that many administrators
don’t actually treat patients, I know of no surgery department in which the
chief does not operate. It is very easy to criticize others if you don’t ever
have to get in the line of fire yourself.
The transplant scenes lacked realism. The doctor who wants
the organs cannot go around and ask for them. Ethically, he must refrain from any
hint of solicitation. When organs are donated, they are distributed by a
network of organ banks. They rarely would stay at the procuring hospital. There
are waiting lists and priorities. Donor families and recipient families would
never be in the close proximity that was depicted in the show.
I liked it at M&M when the chief said to the evil
transplant surgeon, “Tell us how you’ve been bad.” I wish I had thought of that
one when I was running those conferences.
The story line about the girl with the brain tumor was good
except for the part where the trauma surgeon helps talk her into agreeing to
the operation. He’s a versatile guy. But really, a grand piano in the lounge?
Why is everything so dark at the hospital? Is there a
problem with the power grid? I’m waiting for someone to ask for a flashlight.
The show is better at character development than medicine.
Maybe they should stick to the former.
10 comments:
I am having a hard time believing Skeptic Scalpel is/was a surgeon. I am a neurourgery resident, and you are wrong on almost everything you wrote. In particular, you are completely off base about where and how organ procurement agencies distribute organs. I am not sure how long it has been since you practiced, but you need to do your homework. Your blog has become an obnoxious mouth piece of unsubstantiated opinion. I would have a lot more respect for your blog, if it focused more on facts than conjecture. You are guilty of all the thing you criticize.
Hearts and lungs tend to stay local if possible but livers and kidneys are matched to the best recipients and geography is much less of a factor. See this link http://www.organdonor.gov/about/organmatching.html.
I'll stand by my statement that donor and recipient families do not mingle at the time of the transplant.
I'm wondering what else I am wrong about. Please don't tell me your M&M conference bears any resemblance to what the show portrays. As a resident, don't you present the complications? Does your chairman surprise his attendings with information undisclosed until the day of conference? Does your chairman not operate?
I guess the Skeptical Scalpel has fooled General Surgery News into allowing a non-surgeon to be very blunt about some of the sillyness of the medical world.
I am going to dub SS as the Glenn Beck of the surgery world. LOL.
Rugger,
I'm not sure I get what you meant here. Who is the non-surgeon you are referring to? Are you comparing me to Glen Beck?
Haven't watched the show, and don't intend to, but your comments about the inaccurate portrayal of the transplant process rings true. See this article of mine on Hollywood's record on this: http://tinyurl.com/b2fuyo8.
Kevin, thanks for commenting. I urge everyone to read the story you posted a link to. It's a valuable lesson for those who say, "It's just a TV show. Why does it matter how they portray medical situations.
hey Dr. SS,
There's a new reality show on TV tomorrow night about doctors' wives, called Married to Medicine. I know it's just your cup of tea, so look forward to your review ;-)
9pm Sunday on Bravo channel
Emily
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/bravos-married-medicine-preview-video-430336
Sounds like a winner. I'll try to watch.
So, did you watch that Married to Medicine show?
I did. Here's my post on that one.
http://skepticalscalpel.blogspot.com/2013/03/medical-television-hits-new-low.html
Against all odds, I don't believe it has been canceled yet.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.