tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4968787219619380438.post8347733651848331328..comments2023-09-21T04:02:29.457-04:00Comments on Skeptical Scalpel: Just how crazy are people?Skeptical Scalpelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13206922456661320751noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4968787219619380438.post-54763880059351458852010-12-04T07:08:26.960-05:002010-12-04T07:08:26.960-05:00Thanks for your interesting comments. Some contrai...Thanks for your interesting comments. Some contrails are from wing tips, others from engines, which are much closer to each other. That could produce a single contrail.<br /><br />Here are some questions. If this was a missile launch, where was it fired from? If it was from a ship, why hasn't that been confirmed? In the era of Wikileaks and the fact that no one in the government or military can keep a secret for 10 minutes, why has no one come forward to say, "I was there. I saw the missile fired."? Why was the missile fired? The government fires missile from Vandenberg all the time. If they wanted to poison the atmosphere, why not just shoot it from there? Again, there must be hundreds of people involved in the atmosphere poisoning and yet not one person has come forward and said, "I have seen missiles loaded with airborne contraceptives."Skeptical Scalpelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13206922456661320751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4968787219619380438.post-3259421921461184782010-12-04T00:56:00.763-05:002010-12-04T00:56:00.763-05:00Although late, I would like to comment on your &qu...Although late, I would like to comment on your "Mass Delusion" post. <br /><br />No. There is no "mass delusion" on the parts of those that know the indicators of a missile launch. However, "mass delusion" of those that believe the opposite might be true. <br /><br />ContrailScience.com relies on Google Earth to prove its points. However, Google has numerous contracts with the U.S. Government, including both the CIA and Department of Defense. Both Google and the U.S. Government are not credible here because both have strong vested interests in proving that the November 8th event was not a missile launch. And, because ContrailScience.com relies so heavily on Google Earth, it looks and smells as if ContrailScience.com also has a similar vested interest. <br /><br />I have worked for a major airline at LAX for 32 years. My work takes place in a large maintenance bay alongside the longest and most actively-used runway at LAX. During my lifetime, I have witnessed hundreds of thousands - if not millions - of jets taking off, along with their contrails under appropriate conditions. Under the right conditions, contrails evolve off of the tips of an aircraft's wings. Aircraft have TWO wings, not one; thus, if an aircraft was involved, there would be TWO contrails not ONE.<br /><br />Moreover, no passenger aircraft would engage in such a steep angle of attack on departure out of LAX. And, no, single-engine military aircraft do not depart out of LAX. <br /><br />Although I am employed at LAX, I commute to and from work from my home, situated near Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB). Since 1981 I have personally witnessed hundreds, if not thousands, of missile launches. <br /><br />The one-contrail event of November 8 was a definitive missile launch. If conditions were right for aircraft contrails, one would have seen evidence of two THIN contrails, not one gigantic plume! Moreover, even the contrail pattern itself reflects that this was a missile launch. When missiles near their cruise altitude and thus alter their angle of attack,they always falsely "appear" as if they are slowing down or stopping. In reality, the missiles are merely leveling out. <br /><br />ContrailScience.com is a lovely site with wonderful, colorful pictures. However, the site's information on this particular issue appears to be nothing more than usual propaganda.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com